This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this page. Terms of employ.

When AMD launched its Ryzen 7 family, it delivered a scrap that exceeded our expectations in just almost every category, but fell down somewhat in gaming. Exactly how much of a trouble this is depends on whether you tune your testing for CPU-centric or GPU-centric results, and to some extent, what GPU yous utilize. But there was a articulate gap at 1080p in both our Ryzen 7 review and our GTX 1080 Ti testing.

AMD's explanation for this phenomena was to claim that games required substantial optimization to piece of work effectively with Ryzen. This was met with a raised eyebrow from much of the enthusiast community. It's not that these claims are ever unfounded — we've long known that game updates could improve functioning on specific CPU architectures — but that the operation hitting AMD took in gaming in our CPU review occurred across a wide range of titles. Promises that the situation could be fixed by optimization are not the same every bit saying that the situation volition be fixed by optimization, after all. Given AMD'southward relatively limited finances for fixing dozens of older titles, it wasn't clear we'd see much interest from developers.

At least one game has been updated with better Ryzen support, even so. Ashes of the Singularity, from Oxide, initially showed significant performance differences between itself and Intel. This gap persisted fifty-fifty when we used the GPU-centric exam for the game at Crazy detail, as opposed to the Very High settings we used for our CPU-centric testing. A graph from our GTX 1080 Ti review is presented below:

https://www.extremetech.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Ashes-1080Ti-1.png

Only the 1080p tests are relevant for this article. Our GPU testing showed AMD lagging well behind Intel with both the 1070 and the 1080 Ti.

Co-ordinate to PC World, tests they've run in Ashes of the Singularity demonstrate a considerable performance gain for AMD. Their results aren't straight comparable with ours; they've tested low detail while our CPU review used Very High and our 1080 Ti review used Crazy at the 1080p resolution.

PCW-Ryzen

Click to enlarge

PC World reports that their Ryzen 7 1800X tests evidence a 1.27x performance improvement in the GPU-focused test and a more small-scale 12% boost in the CPU-focused test. Still, these improvements are just the beginning according to Oxide developer Dan Baker.

"Every processor is dissimilar on how you lot tune it, and Ryzen gave u.s.a. some new data points on optimization," Oxide's Dan Baker told PCWorld. "Nosotros've invested thousands of hours tuning Intel CPUs to become every terminal bit of performance out of them, but comparatively little fourth dimension and then far on Ryzen."

Bethesda has too pledged to work with AMD to improve game performance in future titles, but information technology'southward not clear which already-shipping titles will be retroactively updated to improve CPU back up. Then again, Ryzen is typically still much faster than Piledriver, and we've seen no evidence nevertheless of a title that falls downwards to the indicate that a CPU optimization patch is critically required.